Sunday, August 11, 2013

An Open Letter to Kabir Suman




I have been an ardent fan of your songs and nurtured great respect for you. But the moment I saw your disgusting antics with folded hands pleading to the Gorkhas expressing your concern for the Lepchas of Gorkhaland, you got so unceremoniously exposed with your fake humanism, artificial creative commitments, intellectual duplicity and disdainful opportunism. The way you gestured with stilted intonation for the Lepchas was so overwhelmingly reprehensive, as if the Gorkahas were the most dreaded violators of basic human rights of the minor communities, as if the Gorkhas were a criminal lot, hell bent on destroying and dislocating the natives of Gorkhaland. This was the most disdainful image I could ever imagine about you. The Lepchas are one of the original inhabitants of the present Gorkhaland and they have become an integral part of the composite culture of the land. And at the common level there has never been mutual animosity between the two communities. Is it not ironic that the Bengal regime and ruling elites, of which you are a part, shedding tears for them only for the last couple years or so? Why did not you compose a few songs on their plight in the beginning of your career? Even a fool can understand that it is a part of a naughty Bengali chauvinistic politics to use the Lepchas as mere conduits to neutralise and discredit the people’s movement for Gorkhaland. The irony is this that the Bengal ruling regime, including the earlier clique of notorious Bengal communists, always considers itself as the smartest lot of the world because they can play well with rhetoric and consider the rest as a collection of idiots.
                Mr. Suman you should go for an encore of your latest performance. You should also fold your those two hands to the Bengalis of Tripura exhorting them to stop injustice against the indigenous native Tripuris; you should also fold your hands to your own government, your lady boss and to your Bengali compatriots expressing your concern for the Rajbanshis, the Bodos, the Rabhas, the Dhimals in North Bengal; you should also fold your hands and shed tears for the atrocities being meted out to the Adivasis and other tribal in rest of Bengal.
                But you are not entirely to blame. You belong to an intellectual legacy which is largely characterised by duplicity and vicious doublespeak. Most of them speak and profess one thing in academic debates and practice quite another in practical context. And it is not limited to the mediocre Bengali intellectuals only; this duplicity applies even to the so called intellectual icons from Bengal including Gayatri Spivak, Amartya Sen, Ranajit Guha, Paratha Chatterjee et al. How come they are so conspicously silent at this juncture of a momentous crisis of a peripheral and a marginal nation like the Gorkhas who have been subjected to the most draconian state terrorism by the present Bengal regime? Why Mr. Suman have you failed to raise a voice of disapproval when hundreds of innocent women have been picked up by the state armed forces and put behind bars for their crime of longing for a space of their own? Why have you failed to raise your voice when false cases are being slapped against the innocents, acting so cheap and nasty by going to the extent of impounding the passport of the Gorkha leadership, showing utter disrespect to the entire people who represent the voice of a marginalised nation? Some of them, with the air of an expert, deliver long discourse on the futility of smaller states. If this is the case why don’t you people chop Bengal into three solid pieces and let it merge with Orissa, Bihar and Assam then the present Bengal can become parts of really big states and prosper?
                Mr. Suman, you have been a creative genius, but you acted like a third grade clown. People will only remember your latest image, and your songs then will be cited as mere jokes of a fake artist, like a lesson on ethics by a castiest Brahmin.   



Tuesday, June 25, 2013




Ethnic Movements and the Post Development Paradigms: Crisis of the Rajbanshi Consciousness




Abstract 

Development is a problematic term because it is, unlike a Biblical axiom, not morally transcendental and, unlike the presumed neutrality of scientific interpretations, it is not secular either. Development is a political term with its intense significance as part of a strategy not only of economic alone but also of cultural politics. After the failure of the western model of development as a universally applicable mode of human redemption, thinkers have engaged in problematising the entire discourse of development from the point of view of post development parameters. Ethnic movements often transform into intense articulations to eventually degenerate into vociferous claims of racial supremacy, particularly because the question of ethnicity eventually devolve into a strategy towards a redemption through the received notions of development. There are counter strategies to neutralize ethnic saliencies by the skilled operators of development idioms by seducing the energy and intensity of such ethnic efforts with supposed exaltations of growth and ‘progress’.

Most ethnic movements fail to reach their vaguely defined goals as they are yet to formulate a narrative free from the erogenous allurements of development rhetoric. The proposed paper seeks to examine the Rajbanshi consciousness movement in Assam and Bengal against its proclaimed goal of achieving ‘Development’ for the community and the subsequent crises it encountered.  




Giorgio Agamben in his, Infancy and History: The Destruction of Experience (NY: Verso, 2007), while speaking of the character of experience in the contemporary reality, suggests that nowadays experience can be approached ‘only with an acknowledgement that it is no longer accessible to us’. (2007, 15) Agamben points out that modern man has been deprived of his biography and similarly his experience has also been expropriated. A modern man lay claim only to his incapacity to have and communicate experience. Agamben underlines the destruction of experience in the ‘humdrum daily life in any city’ which, ‘no longer necessitates a catastrophe’ for ‘modern man’s average day contains virtually nothing that can be translated into experience.’ Agamben goes on to describe the inconsequential details of daily life that an urban man encounters and describes how despite theses experiences being seemingly harrowing or pleasurable, entertaining or tedious, they cannot become experiences. He proclaims that this non translatability into experience has made life intolerable rather than an ‘alleged poor quality of life’ or ‘its meaninglessness compared with the past’. He explains, ‘When humankind is deprived of effective experience and becomes subjected to the imposition of the form of experience as controlled and manipulated as the laboratory maze of rats…then the rejection of experience can provisionally embody a legitimate defence.     
What is the experience of development for an ordinary individual, vis-à-vis the community having intense cultural intimacy with the landscape? Can the received notions of transformation and development ever assume the redemptive warrant of emancipation through development? Can it ensure them a collective experience of ‘progressive growth’?  Why does a community living in the adjunct against the environment of aggressive intervention of ‘development’ fail to experience the transcendental exaltation of emancipation and instead find itself alienated from its native milieu resulting in the deeper awareness of loss and defeat?   

The term ‘development’ is a loaded concept. It is politically relative and intrinsically susceptible to ideological orientation of the agents who ‘imposes’ it. Unlike our common perception, ‘development’ is not a transcendentally locatable mode of human nirvana, hence at various levels of ‘development’ initiatives the affected subjects may not necessarily be the beneficiaries of their benefactors, but might as well be its victims, therefore articulations of discontent gains the warrant of legitimacy within their communal ambit despite the apparent antidote of development being adequately applied by the state agencies.
The concept of development that is in force is largely either capitalist or a sociologist mode of ‘development’ operations which are primarily western imports. Jan Nederveen Pieterse, a postdevelopment theorist, in his essay, ‘After Post Development’ (Third World Quarterly, Vol. 21, 2000, pp. 175-122), emphasised on ‘consensus building’ on development measures. The postdevelopment discourse aims at arriving at a situation that provides, what they call, ‘alternative to development’. Post development thinkers (Arturo Escobar, Gustavo Estevaet al) have challenged the very meaning of development as it, according them, emanates from the essential structural orientation of the colonial discourse that sees development in terms of the conformity to the ‘West-North’ paprameters.
Development entails a set of values, knoweldge, methods of intervention, tools of defining the subjects in accordance with its needs. Hence, not only in terms of its ideational form but also in its actual applied form, development is quintessentially political, ideologically driven process with the potentiality for power, capacity to control, possibilities to rule. The dialectics of power relations become central to the operational dimension of development politcs, and in the process, there are voices that gain saliencies and the voices that are efectively silenced. Development discourse is also characterised  by the rationalising rhetoric forcing voices of dissension sound incongruous and illogical. Postdevelopment underlines development as a discourse with underlying political ideology which is policy oriented and problem driven. It is essentially effective only against a supposed pre-exisiting social theory. It also points out how development has a strong socially cinstructed aspect through which the hegemony of the rulers is reinforced.
Historically, development, in Indian context, has been a legacy essentially predicated upon the normative categories of the colonial regime. As development is not a non ideological/ apolitical idea, it is essentially political, ideologically oriented and discursively potential. Development paradigm under planned structure for the last five and a half decade has been a regime of re-modelled neo-colonial economic practice with zealously guarded over emphasis on extreme centralisation, concentration of development initiatives in the select metros, bureaucratic over dependence making the fundamental development initiatives like basic education, health care, power, road and communication as the breeding ground of redoubtable corrupt practices; more importantly, reducing the marginal territories into raw material territories for the industrial needs of the mainland cities. In fact, in Indian context, the pattern of development regime has been the same as it was in force in the pre independent India despite having rhetorically transformed into a policy regimen driven by the so called tenets of liberal socialist paradigms.
While praising certain achievements of India as a democracy with, at least regular elections, change of regime as per the voting results, free press etc,. Amartya Sen has been critical about the social progress and equity in India. For him this sector has fared worse than the democracy itself. (The Argumentative India 2005, 195) Paradoxically, Sen has been critical about the ‘weakness of the voices of protest’ which, according to him, only contributed in unnecessary slowing down of social opportunities. But at the same time, he argues ‘political voice is extremely important for social equity, and to that recognition we have to add the connection between equitable expansion of social opportunities and the force, range and reach of the process of economic development.’ (2005, 201)

The question of the Rajbanhsi social movements and the subsequent distillation of its consciousness and identity, like most other ethnic entities, have certain common historical parameters and at the same time it has its own unique character primarily because of its dual location in a major way in two neighbouring states- Assam and West Bengal.
The Rajbanshi movement began as a major social movement through its Kshatriya Anodolan having gained its formative shape in the year 1891 under the leadership of widely respected Har Mohan Ray who was the zamindar of Shymapukur in Rongpur of present Bangladesh. The Rajbanshis were organized under the banner of ‘Rongpur Bratya Kshatriya Jatir Unnati Bidhayani Sabha’ and presented a deputation on 10 February, 1891, in front of the Rongpur District Magistrate with the plea to include the Rajbanshis as a separate ethnic entity in the census that was to begin that year. Later under the leadership of Thakur Panchanan Burma the Kshatriya movement of the Rajbanshis took a more comprehensive shape. The first Kshatriya Sanmilani of the Rajbanshis was held on 1st May, 1910 at the Theatre Hall of Rongpur. The session was presided over by an eminent lawyer, Madhusudhan Ray. That was a movement that for the first time, in a major way, made the Rajbanshis aware of themselves as a distinctive social entity that was needed to historically place themselves against a changed social reality in the wake of colonial rule in India that made some different entities as the major players of administrative and economic activities.
The Kshatriya movement was aimed at gaining a social position that was compatible within the casteist structure of Hindu society. It is interesting that in the mainstream society of Bengal, which claimed its Aryan legacy, identified itself as Brahmins, Vaishyas and Shudras but there was no Khastriya community among the mainstream Bengali people. They called themselves as Bratya Khastriyas. The claim of the Rajbanshis to assert themselves as Khastriya had another justification. That is prior to the 1891 census, the Rajbanshis were in fact officially identified as Dravido-Mongoloids. Buchanan Hamilton in his book, Eastern India, (1838) called the Rajbanshis as Koch Rajbanshis. The view was endorsed by other researchers like William Hunter, Hodgson et al and even in the 1872 census identified the Koches and the Rajbanshis as the same ethnic category. This created a peculiar social crisis for the Rajbanshis in the late 19th century. The Rajbanshis could not be ignored simply because they did not conform to the emerging dominant identity category of the Bengalis and at the same time they could not be defined as the Bengalis despite the fact that the geographical territory of the Rajbanshis was made into a part of administrative territory of Bengal. Apart from the sheer number of the Rajbanshis, estimated to be 22 lakhs in present North Bengal and Coochbehar alone before the first general assembly election in 1920 (see the letter written by Panchanan Burma to the Chief Secretary of Bengal on 5 November, 1917), the Rajbanshis were the main owners of the land and were the major peasant community. It  was difficult to write them off.   
 The Kshatriya movement of the Rajbanshis cannot be seen as a mere aspirational move to attain respectability within the casteist framework of Hindu society. This was also necessitated to resist mass conversion of the Rajbanshis by the Christian missionaries. The non political character of the Rajbanshi Khsatriya Samiti was changed when Panchanan Burma turned it into a political organization and all its candidates were victorious in the 1920 election.    Panchanan Burma even defeated the candidates fielded by the Swaraj Party of Chittaranjan Das. The move was effective towards gaining limited political empowerment by the community. But at the social level, the status of the Rajbanhsi remained the same. There was racist segregation of the native and indigenous Rajbanshis as the social pariah in Bengal (both in East and West Bengal). The discrimination and racial disdain of the section of mainstream Bengali was acutely experienced by Panchanan Burma himself when he was practicing law in Rongpur district court as one of the most successful advocates.
It is, however, apparently paradoxical that after having led a movement for the Kshatriya status of the Rajbanshis, Panchanan Burma began a movement for scheduled caste status for the Rajbanshis. In fact, being a member of the constituent committee, Panchanan came into close contact with Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar and began the campaign to include the Rajbanshis as scheduled castes in the constitution to gain constitutional safeguard for the Rajbanshis who were subjected to prolonged state of social deprivation and economic backwardness.  The movement did not gain much support in Assam. However, he was successful in making the Rajbanshis in Bengal as scheduled castes. The move ensured certain immediate advantages. Way back in 1931 when the Colonial government declared ‘Communal Award’ for the Muslims and backward class communities including the scheduled castes, Panchanan Burma joined Baba Saheb Ambedkar to demand reservation for the Rajbanshis as well and spearheaded the movement for the SC status of the Rajbanshis. Nevertheless, he did not find much supporters for the movement in Assam, apparently because the Rajbanshis were not subjected to acute racial discrimination as in Bengal because Assam being a  multi ethnic society with the pre eminent dominance of the indigenous ethnic communities did not experience acute racial and casteist segregation as in Bengal and other parts of India. Hence the leaders like Sarat Sinha, Bhuban Ch. Prodhani and others were not convinced to inspire the Rajbanshis in Assam to go for similar demand. The Rajbanshis in the erstwhile Goalpara district later had to make very strong opposition to the proposal of Mr. Atulya Ghosh, the then state president of Bengal Congress who proposed to annex the district of Goalpara with Bengal in 1955. The Congress committee president of Dhubri district, Sarat Ch. Sinha and other members like Jadabananda Adhikary, Dhirendranath Das as well as Man Gobinda Chakraborty, Dinesh Ranjan Sarkar, Subhash Chakraborty, Giasuddin Ahmed, Hemanta Barkalita, Shibendra Narayan Koch, Kalindranath Nath, Kalicharan Bharali and others also vehemently opposed the proposal of annexing Goalpara with Bengal. There was a major social movement to replace Bengali from all spheres in this part of Assam as a symbolic social resistance against the chauvinistic Bengali designs.

From such a backdrop the renewed agitational movements of the Rajbanshis in recent times both in Assam and Bengal seem redundant and misplaced. But the ongoing movement of the Rajbanshis is a political reality. What does necessitate the continuation of such a long social movement of Rajbanshis? What might have been the reason to seek the same old constitutional safeguards?
Once their relationship with Assamese language and culture was settled in Assam, the movement for Scheduled Tribe status for the Rajbanshis began in 1968. In the All Assam Koch Rajbanshi Kshatriya Sanmilani convention held at Chautara in Kokrajhar, on 7 & 8 February, 1969, this demand for ST became part of the formal agenda of the Rajbanshi movement. Later the movement got a fillip with the leaders like Kabir Ch. Ray Prodhani, Jadabananda Adhikary and others. The Rajbanshis in Bengal began Kamatapur Movement and Greater Coochbehar Movement. As the ST movement failed to yield desired results, the frustration and the deep sense of betrayal crystalised into a major articulation for a separate Kamatapur State.
           One wonders, was there no substatntial development of the Rajbanshis in aspect of their life experience that the political history of the Rajbanshis turns out to be only a long chronicle of movements and agitations?  For the Rajbanshis as an ethnic entity to reach a definable selfhood becomes a continuous project. This has engendered their consciousness as a nation which is associated with the inherent awareness about the issues relating to their identity and ‘nation-ness’. As Puala Moya points out that the theory of identity is inadequate unless it allows to analyse the epistemic status and political salience of any given identity as well the possibilities and different limits of identities. As part of standard strategy, the nations in the periphery have been essentialized[1] by the operators of power and state. However, owing to the limitations of both essentialist and postmodern theorists they tend to overestimate or underestimate political salience of actual identities.
Development as an empowering intervention has apparently failed in case of the Rajbanshis in both Assam and Bengal. The devastating impact of development in Bengal is more acute primarily in relation to the notorious Land Reform initiatives through which the land of the indigenous Rajbanhis were forcefully confiscated rendering them both geographically and culturally displaced and homeless. In Assam the absence of any initiatives to integrate the Rajbanshi people of erstwhile Goalpara to become part of any conceivable economic intervention has progressively alienated and deluded the people. They initially aspire to be co-opted by the  mainstream as they are perpetually threatened of loosing opportunities of both economic and political representation. They eventually discover themselves as entities devoid of experience, or as a collective consciousness that has nothing to translate into experience When one makes a retrospective survey of their social history, it only becomes an exercise to come across the same old juncture from where they found their issues got diluted about one hundred years ago. They discover themselves as entities devoid of experience or as a collective consciousness they find that there is nothing to translate into the logos of experience. As Agamben would point out, he is deprived of his biography and is made to realize that his experience is no longer accessible to him. This is the inevitable experience of the communities continually relegated as the ethnic other.

End note
The West-North parameters have the in built formulaic mechanism to categorise  the North and the West as ‘advanced’, ‘progressive’ and the South, the East as ‘backward’ and ‘primitive’. Wolfgang Sachs would radiacally comment, ‘the idea of development stands like a ruin in the intellectual landscape, (hence) it is time to dismantle this mental structure’






Works Cited

Agamben, Giorgio. Infancy and History: The Destruction of Experience, NY: Verso, 2007.

Pieterse, Nederveen. ‘After Post Development’ Third World Quarterly, Vol. 21, 2000.

Amartya Sen, Argumentative Indian, New Delhi: Penguin, 2000.

Ray, Dr. Deepak Kumar. Manishi Panchanan O Asom. Siliguri, Rajbanshi Akademi,  
         2009.
Das, Dr. Dhirendranath. Ed. Panchanan Smaranika. Dinhata, Coochbehar, Thakur  
         Panchanan Jagriti Mancha, 2005.



[1] Essentialism entails the understanding of individual or groups as having immutable or discoverable ‘essence’- a basic unvariable and presocial nature. As a theoretical concept essentialism expresses itself through the tendency to see the other as one social category (class, gender, race, sexuality etc.). As a political strategy essentialism has both liberatory and reactionary effects.

Presented in the National Seminar on Social Exclusion and Inclusive Development in North East India: Challenges and Opportunities at North Gauhati College, Guwahati in collaboration with UGC, on 10-11 June, 2011.


Ethnicity and Contemporary Assamese Writings *


Assamese as such is not a mono cultural embodiment; it is rather a composite manifestation of multiple voices. Hence, Assamese writing is characteristically polyphonic with multiple nuances arising out of varied ethnic vantages. Contemporary Assamese literature betrays a peculiar awareness of the world and its various complexities, while being rooted to its locale. This has, perhaps, resulted in the involved idiom of some recent Assamese poetry. The ubiquitous element of protest of the post colonial scene has also formatively informed this poetry. This is evident in Samir Tanti’s (b.1956) How do I Blame It’:

                                                How can I hold hunger guilty
                                                hunger is my childhood’s bounty

                                                leaning on its shadow I played the flute
                                                played being Shyam –Kanu

                                                back to back I dreamt
                                                and one day drank a toast

                                                I have no quarrels with it

                                                How can I hold hunger guity
                                                hunger is my mother’s first miscarriage
                                                the third world of my agony.
                       
                (Anthology of Contemporary Poetry from the Northeast p. 65.  Tr. Pradip Acharya)


This poem addresses the native reality of the workers in the tea estates of Assam. The sentiments are human and universal and can be likened to the protest in Black poetry. This has been given a more intimate, personal touch by Jiban Narah (b.1970) in his  ‘Mother’ included in his collection of poems, The Buddha and Other Poems:


                                    Mama, you are drinking more than your need
                                    the grey crop on your head worries you no end
                                    and you drown yourself in the cup
                                    as we are away, you call and holler, pause and wail,
                                    and duck your tears deeper in the pillow.

                                    You’re getting on in age, Mama, but don’t you cry
                                    don’t you drink more getting mad at what father says
                                    you’re addicted you’re hitting it hard
                                    as the night grows you bend over, then sit up again,

                                    you call out to the stars and howl at the moon
                                    you wail, and wailing burst into song

                                    don’t you wail so hard, Mama
                                    let the doves settle on the boughs
                                    or their sorrows too might flow wailing,
                                    if they wail your breasts would go dry

                                    A lean river swells again routinely
                                    your dry breasts wouldn’t ever-
                                    it ails all old women
                                    why would you wail?
                                                                                                            (Tr. Pradip Acharya)

Jiban Narah belongs to the Mising community. An academician by profession, he teaches Assamese, writes in Assamese and in terms of his temperament and attitude belongs to the contemporary time, but his linkages with his native ethnic roots remain vibrant to inform his creative explorations.         
Protest gets militant in the poems of Megan Kachari (b.1967) alias Mithinga Daimari who was the cultural and publicity secretary of the outlawed ULFA and is in jail now. His poems translated into English and published with the title, Melodies and Guns (2006). The book was edited by Indira Goswami and was released in the Frankfurt Book Fair around 2007. Protest is poignant and finds a passionate manifestation in Daimari’s poems as in his poem, ‘Megan and Stray Ramblings’:

                                    Tears make me drink till I am sozzled,
                                    The night sky shivers at my mad rants
                                    My ruined vitals go alert like a cat,
                                    And the startled whore spits at me
                                    Out of hatred, sheer hatred....
                                    Like erosions I steadily break and splinter,
                                    Breaking against the bend in my heart.

                                    The river of sorrow rushed relentlessly on
                                    Don’t you cry anymore,
                                    Leave me your eyes,
                                    I’ll do the crying.

                                                                        (Melodies and Guns, p.13. Tr. Pradip Acharya)

The reflection of folk realities is not peculiar to contemporary Assamese poetry alone. Sibananda Kakoty, a significant short story writer of the period, bases almost all his stories on the quotidian actualities of Vaishnavite hamlets in central Assam. His series of stories on the ‘Bridle Path’, especially ‘The silver roll of the bridle path’, exploits the sacred and the profane, ghosts and goblins as they figure in folk beliefs. The stories of Arupa Patongia Kalita, however, concentrate on women’s concerns. One of the most significant contemporary novelists, Mamoni Raisom Goswami (Indira Goswami), presents the rural women’s lot with telling candidness. In her stories and novels she often moves beyond the confines of her village to varied locales. Her protagonists inhabit different areas of experiences and the narratives are well researched. Her Pages Stained with Blood is one of the few significant Indian novels on the 1984 Delhi riots. While Neelakanthi Braja  feelingly recreates the life of widows in the temple town of Brindavan.
The range and magnitude of earlier novelists like Syed Abdul Malik, Navakanta Barua, Debendranath Acharya or Rangbong Terang are hardly encountered in present day fiction. Abdul Malik’s Longing for the Sunshine, and Devendranath Acharya’s Anya Yug Anya Purush creatively document significant social realities often neglected by history. Nabakanta Barua’s Kapiliparia Xadhu has an intimate classicism and he presents the Roman myth of Hero and Leander as if it were a native sprout. Rongbong Terang’s Rongmilir Hanhi provides an intimate narrative on the ethnic life-world of the Karbis.
Among the recent fictional works, perhaps, the most significant is Rita Choudhury’s Makam which followed her earlier historical fiction, Deolangkhui. These two novels have opened up new narrative possibilities to resurrect ethnic histories of the communities from the brink of oblivion. Deolangkhui is the tale, with the vivacious details, of the ethnic history which the mainstream chroniclers reduced into mere footnotes. Makam, on the other hand, is the epic narration of an ethnic entity that has not only been erased by the social narratives but also has been unceremoniously abandoned by the national memory of the land as history’s wretched orphans. The novel rediscovers the vibrating Chinese community of Assam who settled way back in the early 19th century and were forcefully displaced from the spaces that they so endearingly made their native hearth. Deolangkhui and Makam provide the alternative routes to reach out to history. Rita Choudhury has achieved a rare literary distinction by being able to resurrect the ethnic entities that had to smart from the prolonged silencing of their subdued voices. Her narrative in Deolangkhui creates a historical trajectory to penetrate deep inside the territories that have been perpetually relegated outside the ambit of institutional historiography. She recaptures the histories of the indigenous ethnic royalty that was thriving only in the varied textures of folklore and community memory. She reinvents the indigenous ethnic legacies of the Kacharis, the Chutias, the Koches and others enabling readers to look beyond the received texts of history.   
Makam, perhaps, is the only full scale novel written in the subcontinent that makes a compassionate account of the unspeakable suffering of the Chinese community in India. This is a novel that depicts poignant human tragedy of a community who seemed to have been accursed with eternal suffering. She rediscovers the forgotten people who were a vibrating community in Assam during the early tea plantation period in colonial Assam in the 19th century. The Chinese were the first tea garden workers in the British gardens in Assam. They eventually settled in upper Assam, became a part of the state, made this their own land and allowed their roots to grow deeper through local marriages and mixing with the native populace. They made important contributions to the life and culture of the land including giving Assam its distinctive architecture for they were the ones to have given characteristic pattern of housing with the use of woods and local materials like bamboo. They were also the ones to have built the palaces of Coochbehar king and the zamindar of Gauripur which later became the models for regal architectural structures. Makam narrates the story of their devastating sufferings that followed after the Chinese aggression. Their forceful eviction from their ancestral hearths, their deportation to unknown destinations across places all over India and the atrocities they were subjected to during their those terrible journeys, their being forcefully pushed into the Chinese border and their similar sufferings in China under the draconian communist regime have formed the central theme of Makam which narrates the overwhelming suffering experienced by this small Chinese community which was quite akin to the atrocities unleashed during the Holocaust. The feeling and compassion with which the novel narrates the sufferings of a tiny ethnic entity force the readers to reorient their conventional understanding of the values like patriotism, political ideologies and nationalistic pride. The novel has expanded range of the ethnic discourse in the context of the Northeast. 

The composite culture of the Assamese people is made of diverse ethnic communities. Perhaps, because of this that it has not degenerated into near uniformity of life style, consequent upon globalization, and literature even now, in our mobile spaces, has remained distinctive. Anupama Basumatary who belongs to the Bodo community gives a feel of fresh realities in her poems like ‘Snail’:

                                    Those days I picked the upside down snails
                                    From among the stalks of growing grain
                                    And filled my creel till the neck.
                                    It was fun removing the shells
                                    and watching their recoiling tongues
                                    before I boiled them.
                                    As I sucked the sap and threw the shells
                                    They lay creaking on the floor
                                    in a certain strange rhythm
                                    that hid the agony of their dying.

                                    Now I crawl around the sea-shores
                                    clamber about the land and water
                                    to look for the roots of that strange note
                                    as the marauding waves draw me back and fling

                                    Srangely,an unseen hand picks me up
                                    Sucks my sap and leaves me empty
                                    The shell of my body creaks
                                    in the agony of the heart breaking
                                    and makes the strange measure of a sad strain.
                                                                                                                (Tr. Pradip Ahcarya)

Saurav Saikia and Anubhav Tulasi are mainstream Assamese writers. But they reflect an abidingly dense, sensuous rural reality with modern awareness primarily because of their warm intimacy with their roots. Saurav Saikia’s ‘A Shadow in the Rain’ invests a casual urbane scene with a passionate awareness of the country:

                                    Suddenly it poured
                                    and at the corner of the floating balcony
                                    the sky glowed
                                    May be the market at Rani had
                                    daubed itself in chiffon dazzle by then
                                    I too had ventured out to buy an autumn
                                    blue,a doe’s eyes

                                    And at that instant I saw
                                    not ease,but an ease-thirsty bird,as it were!
                                    Loose T-shirt,tight blue jeans
                                    May be she had come shopping with her mother
                                    to place this alien form in front of the Bijulee theatre
                                    Ah! As if the rain,and the rain went away
                                    The eyes pouring on me stayed stuck to the trees.
(Tr. Pradip Ahcarya)

In like manner, Anbhav Tulasi’s  ‘Evening in the Village’ is a metaphoric reconstruction of a petite country scene:

                                    Evening descends on the village
                                    Painting blue the warp and woof of clouds
                                    Damsels coop in pigeons
                                    with blue feed

                                    In the temple- hall too
                                    beats of the blue drum

                                    Blue water sprouts out
                                    of the willed pond alone

                                    Village belles lay bare their blue to the river
                                    filling the jars with the evening 
                                    The blues plod back home.
                                                                                                                  (Tr. Pradip Ahcarya)

On the other hand, Kabin Phukan(b.1964-2011) has taken a deliberate anti romantic stance in his earlier poetry but the following shows that his anti-romanticism is not a negation of human intimacies and sentiments. His poems, as Pradip Acharya would put it, “retrieves words lost in dictionary and gives them currency” as in ‘A Little Colour’.


I want a little colour,just a dash.
Green,if there is,if not a little red.
Or something veering on the brown.
Even vermillion will do.

If not,just pure white.
I’ll put a dot on the setting,mellow sky
Of evening strains.

.........................................................

Giving the bride the ceremonial bath,
and, after a dip in the Luit,
with corn on the winnowing fan
on the magnifying glass
will go round and round in dance
suppressing the heart’s wail.

                                                                        (Tr. Pradip Acharya)
                                                                                                                               
Assam also has a rich heritage of theatre that began way back in the early sixteen century with the Ankia Naats of the Vaishnavite saint and reformer, Srimanta Sankardeva. Theatre emerged as a major popular art form in recent times with the advent of Bhramyamaan Theatre or Mobile Theatre groups. The major dramatists that had given a definitive character to the theatre movement in Assam were, Birinchi Kumar Barua,Satya Prasad Barua, Durgeswar Borthakur, Bhabendranath Saikia,Taffazzul Ali, Jayanta Barua, Dr.Bhupen Hazarika and the like. Amongst the Assamese playwrights, Arun Sarma is the most academically acclaimed. His plays, Mr.Nibaran Bhattacharya, Ahaar and Aditir Atmakatha, mark a modernist beginning of Assamese theatre. His plays are also considered to be the first Assamese plays to have experimented with the absurdist theatrical elements.

Assamese writings are not confined to the geo-political territory of Assam alone. Assamese literature gains its multi ethnic diversity and varied cultural perspective through the writings that have come from beyond its boundaries. Some of the most significant names of Assamese literature do not belong to the geo-political territory of Assam but Arunachal Pradesh. Lumer Dai was one of the first major literary voices in Assamese from Aruncahal Pradesh. His works like Paharar Sile Sile, Prithivir Hanhin, Mon aru Mon, Koinar Dam et al stand out as some of the most significant creations in Assamese from across its borders.  In contemporary Assamese literary scenario Yeshe Dorjee Thongchi is the most prominent from among the writers in Assamese from Arunachal. Yeshe Dorjee Thongchi, a career bureaucrat and the winner of Sahitya Akademi Award for Assamese writings, has truly expanded the landscape and the horizon of the Assamese literary imagination. The life and the rich nuances of the Apatanis, the Adis, the Abors, and the other ethnic communities of the state have become parts of authentic literary narrative of Assam through the writings of Yeshe Dorjee Thongchi. The greatness of his writings lies in his ability to transcend the limiting compulsions to merely let his narrative degenerate into cultural documentations. His writings have recreated the life of the people with its varied dimensions. Some of the most significant works of Yeshe Dorjee Thongshi are Linjhik, Sonam, Baanh Phoolar Gondh, Sha Kata Manooh, Bih Kanyar Deshat and the like.  Historically, Assamese fictional writings began from the ethnic landscape as the writers like Rajani Kanta Bordoloi and Birendranath Bhattacharya through Miri Jiwari and Yaringom had launched the tradition of modern fiction writing in Assamese. Both these works narrate the life of two major ethnic communities, the Misimgs and the Nagas.  But with the writers like Lumer Dai, Yeshe Dorjee Thongshi and Rongbong Terang the ethnic imaginations have found expressions through its own voices.  Thongchi through his narrative achieves the idioms to narrate the subtle nuances of his society characterized by its multi-ethnic reality. His narrative, to a large extent, negotiates with the abiding sense of distrust that emanated in the intra-ethnic transactions in his society in the wake of the social transitions affected by the onset of modernity. In the land of pastoral innocence, the arrival of modernism has brought along with it the different values like the primacy of material pragmatism which has greatly changed the traditional foundations of the ethnic societies. This has also led to growing misunderstanding and distrust among communities, erosion of their moral universe and destabilization of the vantages from where they used to look at themselves. Dorjee Thongchi has also taken up the issue of seemingly innocuous intrusion of the missionaries that has gradually dislodged the abiding embodiments of their traditional religious and spiritual faiths resulting in the consolidation of culturally incompatible values in their societies.
One major site of Assamese writings that lie beyond its boundaries is Meghalaya, Garo Hills to be precise. Garo Hills in Meghalaya is a home to multi ethnic cultural identities. Apart from the Garos, who are the major community in this part of Meghalaya, there are some other prominent ethnic communities like the Koches, the Rabhas and the Hajongs who have steadily making their literary expressions through their richly endowed Assamese writings.  Umendra Koch in his “My Beloved Country” evolves a different mythic constituency by brining in the myths and folk believes associated with the geo-cultural spaces of his land:

This is the land of clouds
With the enchanting  mysteries of the hills
My beloved country.
The delicate clouds float like
Restless children in search of
The warm love of mother mountain

Along the uneven mountain groves
Rocky terrains, the huts and the trees
The wind blows with a long sigh
The clouds shed tears throughout the year

You would hear the heart rending wail of
The lovers- Bisop and Bidon.
Their cry freezes in the wide heart of lover Umiam
Countless faces of the flowers in the other bank
Adorn the Memang land of Balphakram.
Homeless souls wander
In the bank of Simsang
In the green grassy meadows of Golf Link and Ward’s Lake.
            (Tr. J. Prodhani)

           

Poems of Kushal Koch reveal deep pathos that subtly characterizes the introspective consciousness of his community against a backdrop where social living, at times, becomes a veritable challenge. He expresses the awareness of a deep seated melancholy in his “After the Sunbath”:

                        Since there is nothing to be called as my own
                        I have saved just my mind
                        For the days of future turmoils
                       
                        I measure the warmth of the day at night
                        Measure the beats of my heart
                        In fact, no one understands that
In the scorched heart
A river used to flow
The moon used to brim
The river banks with its dazzle
A plateful of famished meal
And a split heart
You would get
A well preserved heart

I swear
I am so lonely these days
As if am I a puppet in the hands of void.
(Tr. J. Prodhani)

Satindra Hajong, who belongs to the Hajong community living in the Garo hills, endeavours to gain an approximation with the divinity while searching for a spiritually endowed path:
O my Lord
Thou giveth me the path
That is enlightened by your grace
Giveth me the path that leads me to the Buddha
Or giveth the path that would make
This earth my neighbour
(Tr. J. Prodhani)

Minakshi Buragohain teaches Assamese at Tura Government College. Her short stories are cosmopolitan and she is at ease with both urban and rural milieu. Her narrative is enriched by her underlying humour as in her short stories included in her collection, Hatikhutarar Shopon.. Her novel, Nokme, is an authentic portrait of the Garo society. She affectionately fictionalizes the subdued pains of a common Garo woman through her protagonist, Nokme. Minakshi Buragohain’s narrative opens up the possibilities of the deeper understanding of the Garo society for the mainstream Assamese readers for whom the ethnic society of the Garos, to a large extent, has mostly remained elusive following cultural distance that occurred for various reasons.
 Assamese contemporary writings reflect a deep resonance of the intimate folk realities of diverse ethnic communities. These writings make successful attempts to transcend the confines of, what Pradip Acharya calls, ‘accessible history’. In his essay, ‘Meandering in Assam’, Prof. Acharya writes, ‘In fact, we are so used to the written word that we forget that there were centuries of literature before the first word came to be written. Folk tales, songs, riddles etc.(oral literature) lengthen our past, and they are handed down from generation to generation, and in a place like Assam, they persist till this day. They change and are often added to. They are living memory, not ethnography.’ (2009, pp. 25-26)





References:

Acharya, Devendranath. Kalpurush. Guwahati: Banalata, 2007 (3rd Edn).

Acharya, Pradip. ‘Meandering in Assam’ in Glimpses from the North-East. New Delhi:                    National Knowledge Commission, 2009.

Buragohain, Minakshi. Hatikhutarar Shopon. Guwahati:L Akhar Prakash, 2009.

__________________Nokme Guwahati: Purbanchal Prakash, 2010.

Chakraborty, Paritosh. Ed. Paharor Okho Ting (A Collection of Essays). Tura: Tura          Sahitya Charcha Kendra, 2007.

Choudhury, Rita. Deolangkhui. Guwahat: Jyoti Prakashan, 2010 (7th Edition)
______________. Makam. Guwahat: Jyoti Prakashan, 2011

Kachari, Megan. Melodies and Guns. Ed. Indira Goswami.NewDelhi.UBSPD,2007                (first reprint)

Koch, Nirmal. Bodhidroom. Borkona: Borkona Kali Dhaam, 2011-08-14

Koch, Umendra. Spriha (Anthology of Assamese Poems) Tura: Eeu Dee Printers, 1997.

_____________. Jagriti (Anthology of Assamese Poems) Tura: Eeu Dee Printers, 1998

Narah, Jiban. The Buddha and Other Poems. Calicut: Monsoon Editions, 2008

Tanti,Samir,. ‘How do I Blame It’ in Anthology of Contemporary Poetry from the              Northeast. Eds. Kympham Sing Nongkynrih and Robin S.Ngangom. Shillong;   NEHU 2003

Deka, Basanta. Ed. Assam: Land and People. Guwahati: K.C.Das Commerce College       Publications, 2009.

                       


*This is a modified version of the paper presented in the National Seminar on Literary Trends: Northeastern Trends and Streams.  Organized by WB State University in collaboration with Sahitya Akademi at Bharatiya Bhasha Bhavan, Kolkata, 18 & 19 August, 2009.